The Real Cost Of Holding Onto Business Devices For Too Long

You are here


 

Device refresh is often treated as an IT purchasing decison, something to address when devices reach end of life or budget becomes avaliable. It has much broader implications for productivity, security, employee experience and cost across the organisation. When budgets are under pressure, extending the life of laptops and desktops can seem like a sensible way to reduce expenditure. If devices are still functioning, there can be little urgency to replace them. The challenge is that the purchase price is only one part of the equation. As a device fleet ages, costs begin to emerge elsewhere through increased IT support, reduced productivity, security exposure, compatibility issues and unplanned replacements. Delaying a refresh may reduce immediate capital expenditure, but it can also shift costs into other areas of the business.

 

Look beyond the purchase price

A more effective device strategy considers the total cost of ownership across the technology lifecycle, rather than focusing solely on the cost of replacement. As devices age, batteries deteriorate, performance can decline and hardware issues become more frequent. New applications and operating systems may also place greater demands on older hardware, while IT teams spend increasing amounts of time troubleshooting and maintaining individual devices. Individually, these issues can seem relatively minor. Across an entire organisation, however, they can have a significant cumulative impact. Even small amounts of time lost each day to slow start-ups, application delays or device issues can translate into substantial productivity losses across hundreds of employees over the course of a year. There is also an impact on IT resources. Time spent maintaining ageing devices is time that could otherwise be directed towards strategic technology initiatives and improvements.

 

The pain points aren't always obvious

Many device lifecycle costs remain relatively hidden until a problem occurs. Across an ageing fleet, some of the most common impacts include: Higher support requirements: Older devices can require more troubleshooting, repairs and hands-on support from IT. Reduced employee productivity: Slow start-ups, deteriorating batteries, crashes and sluggish applications can gradually affect the working day. Greater security exposure: Older hardware may not support the latest operating systems or security capabilities. Inconsistent user experience: A mixed fleet can mean employees performing similar roles have very different technology experiences. Unplanned replacement costs: Waiting for devices to fail can turn a planned investment into an urgent purchase with less flexibility around timing and cost. More complex fleet management: Different models, operating systems, warranties and device ages increase the complexity of managing the environment. Taken together, these factors make device refresh more than a hardware purchasing exercise. It becomes an important part of broader technology and business planning.

 

When is the right time to refresh?

There is no single replacement cycle that will suit every organisation. The right approach depends on how devices are being used, the needs of different employee groups, security and compliance requirements, the applications being run, warranty coverage and the ongoing cost of supporting the existing fleet. A user running demanding applications, for example, is likely to have very different device requirements to someone whose work is primarily browser and cloud based. Rather than replacing every device according to a fixed schedule, organisations can benefit from understanding where ageing technology is beginning to create additional cost, risk or productivity issues. This also helps avoid replacing devices unnecessarily and allows investment to be directed towards the areas where it will have the greatest impact.

 

Turn device refresh into a predictable business cycle

A planned approach to device lifecycle management gives organisations greater control over both technology and expenditure. Instead of allowing large portions of the fleet to reach end of life at the same time, devices can be assessed and refreshed according to actual business need. This makes expenditure easier to forecast, allows priority users and workloads to be addressed first, and creates a more consistent technology environment over time. A refresh cycle is also an opportunity to reconsider what employees actually need from their devices. The way people work has changed considerably. Hybrid working, video collaboration, cloud applications, AI-enabled tools and increasing security requirements are all placing new demands on business devices. As a result, a refresh should not simply mean replacing an existing laptop with a newer equivalent. It is an opportunity to ensure your device strategy reflects how people work today and what the organisation will require in the years ahead.

 

Start with the numbers

Before deciding whether to extend or refresh your current fleet, it is worth looking closely at the environment you already have. How old is your current fleet? Which devices are generating the most support requirements? Which warranties are approaching expiry? Are employees experiencing performance or battery issues? Do older devices continue to meet your security requirements? And what is the ongoing cost of maintaining the current environment? Comparing these factors with the cost of replacement provides a much clearer view of total cost of ownership and can help identify where investment should be prioritised. This is where Area9 can help. Rather than treating device refresh as a one-off hardware purchase, Area9 works with organisations to understand their existing environment, user requirements, budget and broader technology roadmap. From there, we can help develop a practical refresh strategy that balances performance, security, cost and the needs of your people. Planning your next device refresh?

 

 

 

 

Share